- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 07:56:41 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2015 06:57:11 UTC
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes:
> At today's f2f, we discussed the meaning of <p:input/>. The nominated
> options were, it's the same as:
>
> <p:input>
> <p:pipe/>
> </p:input>
>
> i.e., a binding to the default readable port (per discussed but not yet
> implemented changes to p:pipe), or:
>
> <p:input>
> <p:empty/>
> </p:input>
>
> Unfortunately, I don't think it's that simple, because:
>
> "An input declaration may include a default connection. If no
> connection is provided for an input port which has a default
> connection, then the input is treated as if the default connection
> appeared."
On reflection this morning, maybe that can be finessed as the case where
no p:input is provided at all.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 512 761 6676
www.marklogic.com
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2015 06:57:11 UTC