- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 07:56:41 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2015 06:57:11 UTC
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes: > At today's f2f, we discussed the meaning of <p:input/>. The nominated > options were, it's the same as: > > <p:input> > <p:pipe/> > </p:input> > > i.e., a binding to the default readable port (per discussed but not yet > implemented changes to p:pipe), or: > > <p:input> > <p:empty/> > </p:input> > > Unfortunately, I don't think it's that simple, because: > > "An input declaration may include a default connection. If no > connection is provided for an input port which has a default > connection, then the input is treated as if the default connection > appeared." On reflection this morning, maybe that can be finessed as the case where no p:input is provided at all. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 512 761 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2015 06:57:11 UTC