- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:44:03 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 17:44:38 UTC
Folks, At today's f2f, we discussed the meaning of <p:input/>. The nominated options were, it's the same as: <p:input> <p:pipe/> </p:input> i.e., a binding to the default readable port (per discussed but not yet implemented changes to p:pipe), or: <p:input> <p:empty/> </p:input> Unfortunately, I don't think it's that simple, because: "An input declaration may include a default connection. If no connection is provided for an input port which has a default connection, then the input is treated as if the default connection appeared." I wonder if default connections are worth the trouble. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 512 761 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 17:44:38 UTC