- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:44:03 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 17:44:38 UTC
Folks,
At today's f2f, we discussed the meaning of <p:input/>. The nominated
options were, it's the same as:
<p:input>
<p:pipe/>
</p:input>
i.e., a binding to the default readable port (per discussed but not yet
implemented changes to p:pipe), or:
<p:input>
<p:empty/>
</p:input>
Unfortunately, I don't think it's that simple, because:
"An input declaration may include a default connection. If no
connection is provided for an input port which has a default
connection, then the input is treated as if the default connection
appeared."
I wonder if default connections are worth the trouble.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 512 761 6676
www.marklogic.com
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 17:44:38 UTC