the case for p:sign step ?

In my travels for satisfying other actions, I noticed an older use
case (as described by Henry)

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2006Feb/0062.html

this is also annotated in the interim artifact

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2006Feb/0062.html

any thoughts on p:sign for XProv v2 ? Do we need to add to our current
requirements doc ?

http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc-v2-req/

J

Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2015 10:51:34 UTC