- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:27:52 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87sikqc0mf.fsf@nwalsh.com>
See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/20-minutes
[1]W3C
- DRAFT -
XML Processing Model WG
Meeting 249, 20 Aug 2014
[2]Agenda
See also: [3]IRC log
Attendees
Present
Norm, Loren, Jim, Alex
Regrets
Chair
Norm
Scribe
Norm
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Accept this agenda?
2. [6]Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
3. [7]Next meeting: 27 Aug 2014
4. [8]We got rechartered!
5. [9]Test suite at github
6. [10]Issue #7
7. [11]Issue #10
8. [12]Spec updates?
9. [13]Zip/Unzip steps
10. [14]Bug reports
11. [15]Any other business?
* [16]Summary of Action Items
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accept this agenda?
-> [17]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/20-agenda
Accepted.
Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
-> [18]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/07/02-minutes
Accepted.
Next meeting: 27 Aug 2014
Jim gives probably regrets.
We got rechartered!
<jfuller> YEEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAAA
Norm: We're rechartered, y'all get to rejoin and welcome Loren.
Test suite at github
-> [19]https://github.com/xproc/test-suite
Norm explains the background: tests on github but for process reasons the
test suite still runs from tests.xproc.org
Jim: Do we plan a different branch for v2.
Norm: I should have said the repo defaluts to the branch xproc10
Jim: I'm not sure how we're going to deal with backwards
incompatibilities. I'm not sure we've enumerated them all.
Norm: I don't think we have, I don't think we know all the differences.
Alex: What are we going to do with a 2.0 processor that includes a 1.0
pipeline.
Norm: I think we'll have to consider the difference in semantics.
... It would be best if 1.0 pipelines would silently work most of the
time.
Jim: When we work out what the backwards incompatabilities are, we'll have
to document them.
-> [20]https://github.com/xproc/test-suite/pull/6
Norm: All I did was patch the result so that it would be consistent.
Anyone object to this change?
<jfuller> +1 to that change, looks reasonable
Accepted.
Issue #7
-> [21]https://github.com/xproc/test-suite/pull/7
Norm: This one fixes quoted charsets.
<alexmilowski> FYI, [22]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_URI_scheme
<alexmilowski> file://host/path
<jfuller> FWIW - I am equally fine with both
Norm: I'll do a little investigation.
Investigation reveals that RFC 2616 defines a parameter as either a token
or a quoted string.
Norm: Ok. Quoted strings are allowed, I suppose it follows that we
shouldn't change the test.
Alex: We should minute the reference to RFC 2616 so we don't have to do
this exercise again.
Norm: I believe you just did.
Issue #10
-> [23]https://github.com/xproc/test-suite/issues/10
->
[24]https://github.com/xproc/test-suite/blob/xproc10/tests/optional/psvi-required-001.xml
Norm: I think the comment is correct.
Jim: Is there spec work required?
Norm: No, the spec is clear the test is just inadequate.
... I propose we add psvi-required to the test. An implementation that
supports PSVI will continue to work and an impl that doesn't will fail
differently, but more reliably.
Alex: I think we need to consider whether or not 'psvi-required' is a good
term. No one knows about it anymore, it's all handled by whether or not
you validate.
Norm: Any objections to the change?
... None heard
Spec updates?
Norm: Alex, have you made any progress on your parameters task?
Alex: No, and it won't happen until mid-September at least. I don't think
it'll take long, I'm just going to take a chainsaw to the spec.
... I suggest we just merge that one without review; it's moving deck
chairs not making substantive changes.
Norm: Yes, that makes sense.
Zip/Unzip steps
Norm: No progress, I assume.
Bug reports
Norm: I've done a little drafting but haven't got anything ready yet
... I will try to have that ready next week.
Any other business?
None heard, we are adjourned.
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [25]scribe.perl version 1.138 ([26]CVS
log)
$Date: 2014-08-20 21:26:45 $
References
1. http://www.w3.org/
2. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/20-agenda
3. http://www.w3.org/2014/08/20-xproc-irc
4. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/20-minutes#agenda
5. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/20-minutes#item01
6. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/20-minutes#item02
7. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/20-minutes#item03
8. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/20-minutes#item04
9. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/20-minutes#item05
10. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/20-minutes#item06
11. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/20-minutes#item07
12. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/20-minutes#item08
13. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/20-minutes#item09
14. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/20-minutes#item10
15. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/20-minutes#item11
16. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/20-minutes#ActionSummary
17. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/20-agenda
18. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/07/02-minutes
19. https://github.com/xproc/test-suite
20. https://github.com/xproc/test-suite/pull/6
21. https://github.com/xproc/test-suite/pull/7
22. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_URI_scheme
23. https://github.com/xproc/test-suite/issues/10
24. https://github.com/xproc/test-suite/blob/xproc10/tests/optional/psvi-required-001.xml
25. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
26. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2014 21:28:24 UTC