- From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 06:29:12 +0200
- To: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- Cc: XProc WG <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
I agree that the language could be cleaned up … any suggestions ? J On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 3:36 AM, James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> wrote: >> >> The p:template note states at the end of 1. Introduction >> >> 'Where the expressions occur in attribute values, their string value >> is used. Where they appear in text content, their node values are >> used.' >> >> though as this is a Note we can just change the document, but don't >> you think this sentence is enough ? > > > Well, I'm not sure. "Node value" isn't really an official term. So, what > is the "node value" of a attribute node that can't be copied into the > children of an element? It is also a confusing term to using as we usually > mean a "copy of the node" and, yet, we can't copy the attribute node into a > child. > > "node value" also means "attribute value" in the context of the DOM. > > "node value" has no meaning in the context of the XDM. > >> >> >> You can still do string(/element/@someattr) to achieve what you want. >> > > Yes, of course, that's what I had to do. > > I put this in the category of "expected behavior." > > > -- > --Alex Milowski > "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the > inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language > considered." > > Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Monday, 3 June 2013 04:29:39 UTC