- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 08:46:37 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 9 August 2013 12:47:05 UTC
"Toman, Vojtech" <vojtech.toman@emc.com> writes: > Interesting. What about importing functions/modules declared inline > in the XProc pipeline? Interesting. I suppose an import element could allow content. > I am also wondering about the implications of the above on the XProc > processor XPath context. It would probably mean, among other things, > that we would have to make the function library in the XPath context > scoped, similar to what we do with variable bindings. Ugh. But, yes. :-) Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 512 761 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Friday, 9 August 2013 12:47:05 UTC