- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 08:46:37 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 9 August 2013 12:47:05 UTC
"Toman, Vojtech" <vojtech.toman@emc.com> writes:
> Interesting. What about importing functions/modules declared inline
> in the XProc pipeline?
Interesting. I suppose an import element could allow content.
> I am also wondering about the implications of the above on the XProc
> processor XPath context. It would probably mean, among other things,
> that we would have to make the function library in the XPath context
> scoped, similar to what we do with variable bindings.
Ugh. But, yes. :-)
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 512 761 6676
www.marklogic.com
Received on Friday, 9 August 2013 12:47:05 UTC