- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:05:03 -0700
- To: XProc WG <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Here are the "minutes" from our "non-meeting" as it was just Henry, Vojtech, and myself. We had an informal discussion while waiting for a few more to join. Alas, it was just us and so we ended the call. 14:10:29 [ht] [informal chat about what the public impact of adding binary data to XProc might be -- is it really still _X_ Proc 14:10:31 [ht] ] 14:11:07 [ht] HST wondering whether there is some way to make this a detachable extra 14:11:17 [ht] XProc and XProc++ 14:11:24 [alexmilowski] Vojtech: still trying to make it an XML language but make it possible to handle other media types 14:12:41 [alexmilowski] Alex: Binding and producing something that is not XML from a pipeline is a lot of work. 14:13:11 [alexmilowski] Vojtech: Having to interface with an external program is not user friendly. 14:14:31 [alexmilowski] Henry: Experience at MT suggested there were a number of applications where there were difference input/output adapters. 14:15:35 [alexmilowski] Henry: If we had a resource manager, having a steps that write and read non-XML ... 14:16:10 [alexmilowski] Vojtech: There are problems with sequencing when steps do not depend on each other. 14:19:55 [alexmilowski] Vojtech: It is mostly a boundary problem. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Friday, 21 September 2012 23:05:31 UTC