- From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 21:50:44 +0200
- To: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- Cc: XProc WG <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:05 AM, James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> wrote: >> Hello Alex, >> >> Perhaps this was a discussion I missed but it was my understanding that >> >> a) we are creating a new requirements document >> >> b) this document refers back to original requirement v1 document as >> well as a 'report card' of how well those requirements were fulfilled >> by v1.0 (the doc which now contains use cases and examples) > > What I am suggesting is we publish a note that details how we have met > v1 requirements and use cases. Then we can produce a new v2 > requirements and use case document that doesn't incorporate the v1 > document's content verbatim. We can then combine, finesse, or > eliminate things for v2 and produce a clear and possibly more compact > document. +1, thx for the clarification J
Received on Monday, 1 October 2012 19:51:11 UTC