- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 12:47:24 -0700
- To: XProc WG <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:05 AM, James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> wrote: > Hello Alex, > > Perhaps this was a discussion I missed but it was my understanding that > > a) we are creating a new requirements document > > b) this document refers back to original requirement v1 document as > well as a 'report card' of how well those requirements were fulfilled > by v1.0 (the doc which now contains use cases and examples) What I am suggesting is we publish a note that details how we have met v1 requirements and use cases. Then we can produce a new v2 requirements and use case document that doesn't incorporate the v1 document's content verbatim. We can then combine, finesse, or eliminate things for v2 and produce a clear and possibly more compact document. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Monday, 1 October 2012 19:47:52 UTC