Re: Extending p:log (action A-214-01)

Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com> writes:
> 1) Why two elements ?  Why not just a <p:report> with an optional test attribute

Oh. Uhm. Yeah, I guess that would work. I vote "concur" on that decision :-)

> 2) What is the context of the test : the current sequence of document ?

Yes. For all expressions evaluated (however we decide to do that) the
context item is the document that is being logged.

> 3) With respect to variable, we already have the p:template behaviour,
> so we could just say that the content of <p:report> is evaluated as if
> it was <p:template> ?

Ah. Yes. Good thinking, Mohamed!

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 413 624 6676
www.marklogic.com