Re: Naming issue on Compound Steps in XProc 1.0 REC

Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com> writes:
> I respectfully disagree here with your reasonning : we could have said
> that we connect the "error" port on the "p:try" (the same way we
> connect the "current" port on the "p:for-each"

Uh. Except that the error port isn't on the try, it's on the catch.
And it would be wrong to have it on the try as that would allow steps
in the group to read the error port.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 413 624 6676
www.marklogic.com