- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:49:15 -0500
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 10:07 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: > Hi folks, > > Liam reports: > > > Jeff Jaffe pushed back and said he was unwilling to charter a WG with no > > Rec-track deliverables. > > He suggested a few possible alternatives: That is, I suggested... Another choice might be to include a FPWD of 2.0 in the charter, along with a possible Workshop. > > 1. Extend the WG as-is for a short time to wrap up current work then > have a workshop to get participation & requirements > > 2. Merge with XML Core. We became an independent WG mostly because one > of the participants in XML Core objected to having the work done in > Core. But they're no longer participating in XML Core, so that's no > longer an issue. > > 3. Make a Business Group to come up with requirements > > Let's talk about this tomorrow. > > Blech. > > Be seeing you, > norm > -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2012 18:50:42 UTC