- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:07:16 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2012 15:07:50 UTC
Hi folks, Liam reports: > Jeff Jaffe pushed back and said he was unwilling to charter a WG with no > Rec-track deliverables. He suggested a few possible alternatives: 1. Extend the WG as-is for a short time to wrap up current work then have a workshop to get participation & requirements 2. Merge with XML Core. We became an independent WG mostly because one of the participants in XML Core objected to having the work done in Core. But they're no longer participating in XML Core, so that's no longer an issue. 3. Make a Business Group to come up with requirements Let's talk about this tomorrow. Blech. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 413 624 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2012 15:07:50 UTC