- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:30:12 +0000
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I'm surprised/possibly dismayed to find that the relevant notation and
and entity decls are among the few things which the XML
spec. _requires_ to be reported to an application, on encountering an
attribute of type ENTITY, ENTITIES or NOTATION. . .
See sections 4.4.6 and 4.7 [Note there's a typo in the _Infoset_ spec
in Appendix B -- item 6 should refer to 4.4.6 and 4.7 in the XML
spec.]
SAX2 does in fact support this. . .
Hmm.
I guess we have to require it (that is, the relevant props are going
to go in class P -- if you've seen the decls, you must report them).
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFNXU0UkjnJixAXWBoRAjDtAJ9BhlSA7roOdSDaYTJH1mk5UUjeiACfRpJN
s5g5NWYPlhdvjsNqg8DEXbI=
=keoo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2011 16:31:50 UTC