- From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:25:01 +0100
- To: vojtech.toman@emc.com
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <AANLkTimkptvbi_1DME0GZL7bJ1hs5RVyagF-OruT9XtB@mail.gmail.com>
Me too :( On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:07 PM, <vojtech.toman@emc.com> wrote: > Of course I tried to dial in using the old time. My apologies. > > Vojtech > > > -- > Vojtech Toman > Consultant Software Engineer > EMC | Information Intelligence Group > vojtech.toman@emc.com > http://developer.emc.com/xmltech > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: public-xml-processing-model-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml- > > processing-model-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh > > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 4:27 PM > > To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > > Subject: XProc Minutes 17 February 2011 > > > > [Fixed Subject:, sorry for the duplication.] > > > > See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-minutes > > > > [1]W3C > > > > - DRAFT - > > > > XML Processing Model WG > > > > Meeting 189, 17 Feb 2011 > > > > [2]Agenda > > > > See also: [3]IRC log > > > > Attendees > > > > Present > > Paul, Norm, Henry, Alex > > > > Regrets > > > > Chair > > Norm > > > > Scribe > > Norm > > > > Contents > > > > * [4]Topics > > > > 1. [5]Accept this agenda? > > 2. [6]Accept minutes from the previous meeting? > > 3. [7]Next meeting: telcon, 24 Feb 2011? > > 4. [8]Review of XML processor profiles draft > > 5. [9]Namespace documents > > 6. [10]Any other business? > > > > * [11]Summary of Action Items > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------ > > > > Accept this agenda? > > > > -> [12]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-agenda.html > > > > Accepted. > > > > Accept minutes from the previous meeting? > > > > -> [13]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/03-minutes.html > > > > Accepted. > > > > Next meeting: telcon, 24 Feb 2011? > > > > Henry gives regrets for 24 Feb; no other regrets heard. > > > > Review of XML processor profiles draft > > > > Norm: Thank you, Henry. > > > > Paul: I like the way it's going, but I'm still not entirely sure > > what the > > different classes, A, A', and B are. > > > > Henry: Yes, I agree. When I started, I thought there'd be one class > > per > > profile, but that's not the way it worked out. I'll add a gloss. > > > > Paul: My other two things were even more editorial. > > ... I'm not sure if everyone will understand the distinctions > > between > > information items and properties and the classes. > > > > Henry: I'll think about that. I'm not sure an attempt to clarify > > would > > help. > > > > Paul: Given that we're thinking of releasing a third edition of the > > Infoset, I wonder if we should make an edition agnostic reference to > > the > > Infoset. > > > > Norm: Vojtech also had some questions, but he's not here. > > > > Henry: I'll try to get John Cowan or Richard Tobin to look carefully > > at it > > and see if I've got the class annotations correct. Some of these are > > not > > at all obvious. > > ... In some cases the choices are a little arbitrary. > > ... They could be wrong. I'm going to wait a week and then try to > > take a > > fresh look. > > ... The question Vojtech asks is a tricky one. I had forgotten I > > think > > that references isn't just for ID/IDREF. > > > > Alex: Should processing instruction notation just be X? References > > is more > > complicated. > > > > Henry: I really don't like making references implementation > > dependent. > > This just gets a little messier. As it says several times, this > > table uses > > items/properties to identify things in the document. There are > > multiple > > data models. > > ... I'm going to leave notations and unparsed entities as X, but > > ... I really don't like making references implementation dependent. > > This > > just gets a little messier. As it says several times, this table > > uses > > items/properties to identify things in the document. There are > > multiple > > data models. > > ... I'm going to leave notations and unparsed entities as X, but > > ... I'm going to change processing instruction notation to X, but > > I'll > > split id/idref references and entities/entities notation references > > into > > two parts. > > ... Everybody should report the references property with respect to > > IDs, > > that's not negotiable. > > ... Does that sound like it works? > > > > Norm: I think so... > > ... So, Henry, you're going to prepare another draft for us? > > > > Henry: Yes. I'm afraid this means another WD though. > > > > Norm: Yes, but that's fine. > > > > Namespace documents > > > > Norm: Mohamed pointed out a few more oversights, anyone else see any > > problems? > > > > Nobody says so. > > > > Norm: Ok, I'll fix the problems Mohamed pointed out and try again. > > > > Any other business? > > > > Alex: Do we have an XProc meeting planned at XML Prague? > > > > Henry: I've agreed to do a 10 minute slot about processor profiles. > > > > Alex: It would be nice to get some feedback. > > > > Adjourned. > > > > Summary of Action Items > > > > [End of minutes] > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------ > > > > Minutes formatted by David Booth's [14]scribe.perl version 1.135 > > ([15]CVS > > log) > > $Date: 2011/02/17 15:25:55 $ > > > > References > > > > 1. http://www.w3.org/ > > 2. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-agenda > > 3. http://www.w3.org/2011/02/17-xproc-irc > > 4. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-minutes#agenda > > 5. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-minutes#item01 > > 6. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-minutes#item02 > > 7. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-minutes#item03 > > 8. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-minutes#item04 > > 9. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-minutes#item05 > > 10. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-minutes#item06 > > 11. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-minutes#ActionSummary > > 12. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-agenda.html > > 13. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/03-minutes.html > > 14. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm > > 15. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2011 16:25:36 UTC