- From: <vojtech.toman@emc.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 03:29:20 -0500
- To: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
> Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> writes:
> > I don't see why this makes things easier. That's like saying since
> > "&" has to be escaped in XML and we use ";" to end entity
references,
> > a ";" needs to be escaped.
> >
> > I would prefer it to not be an error unless we find some *really*
good reason.
>
> So if I want to include "{some content}" literally in my template, I
> have to generate
>
> <script>function f() {{some content}</script>
>
> rather than
>
> <script>function f() {{some content}}</script>
I didn't mean that you have to use }, I meant that if the parser sees a
stray '}' in the regular mode, it does not report an error but treats it
as a literal '}' character, like it was '}}'.
So both examples above would produce the same result.
>
> And if I do use the second form, I'll get:
>
> <script>function f() {some content}}</script>
>
> in the output.
No, that is a wrong interpretation. See above.
Vojtech
--
Vojtech Toman
Consultant Software Engineer
EMC | Information Intelligence Group
vojtech.toman@emc.com
http://developer.emc.com/xmltech
Received on Monday, 22 November 2010 08:30:43 UTC