XProc Minutes 18 Feb 2010

See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/18-minutes

[1]W3C

                                   - DRAFT -

                            XML Processing Model WG

Meeting 168, 18 Feb 2010

   See also: [2]IRC log

Attendees

   Present
           Norm, Alex, Henry, Paul

   Regrets
           Vojtech, Mohamed

   Chair
           Norm

   Scribe
           Norm

Contents

     * [3]Topics

         1. [4]Accept this agenda?
         2. [5]Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
         3. [6]Next meeting: telcon, 25 Feb 2010?
         4. [7]020 wrapper-prefix and wrapper-namespace on p:data
         5. [8]How to get to PR
         6. [9]Any other business?

     * [10]Summary of Action Items

   --------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Accept this agenda?

   -> [11]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/18-agenda

   Henry: I won't be ready to talk about the default processing model before
   April

   Accepted

  Accept minutes from the previous meeting?

   -> [12]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/11-minutes

   Accepted.

  Next meeting: telcon, 25 Feb 2010?

   No regrets given.

  020 wrapper-prefix and wrapper-namespace on p:data

   Norm summarizes.

   Norm: My temptation is to leave it. Less spec churn and no actual harm.

   Henry: It's arguably the case that we were mistaken about why we did this
   and it's unlikely to be used, but the example is correct and it isn't
   wrong to leave it.

   Norm: Is anyone in favor of backing this change out?

   None heard.

   Proposal: Leave the status quo.

   Accepted.

   [13]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/langspec.html#p.data

   Some discussion about to whom the "shoulds" are directed in 5.14.

  How to get to PR

   Norm summarizes the state of play wrt coverage and implementations.

   Henry: We need two passes in every row to go through without a hitch. We
   can go forward w/o but each case has to be justified.

   -> [14]http://tests.xproc.org/tests/optional/validrng-007.xml

   Henry: Remove this test. It's not a problem with XProc, it's a problem
   with underlying RNG implementations.

   Some discussion of other tests that could be written.

   Norm: In short: we're very close.
   ... Can anyone think of other roadblocks that I've overlooked.

   None heard.

  Any other business?

   None heard.

   Adjourned.

Summary of Action Items

   [End of minutes]

   --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [15]scribe.perl version 1.135 ([16]CVS
    log)
    $Date: 2010/02/22 19:29:07 $

References

   1. http://www.w3.org/
   2. http://www.w3.org/2010/02/18-xproc-irc
   3. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/18-minutes#agenda
   4. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/18-minutes#item01
   5. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/18-minutes#item02
   6. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/18-minutes#item03
   7. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/18-minutes#item04
   8. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/18-minutes#item05
   9. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/18-minutes#item06
  10. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/18-minutes#ActionSummary
  11. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/18-agenda
  12. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/11-minutes
  13. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/langspec.html#p.data
  14. http://tests.xproc.org/tests/optional/validrng-007.xml
  15. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
  16. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/