- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:46:45 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2zl3guh96.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Toman_Vojtech@emc.com" <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> writes: > Detecting infinite recursion in any pipeline that is more complex than > the (degenerated) example above would be difficult (recursion may be > driven by dynamic logic), but perhaps we should at least say that the > behavior of the processor is implementation-dependent in this case? Or > do we want to have a dynamic error that could be used for reporting > infinite recursion? We have a warning in 2.12, Security Considerations, where we say a "conformant implementation may raise dynamic errors, or take any other corrective action, for any security problems that it detects." I don't think we need to do any more in the spec. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Society is immoral and immortal; it can http://nwalsh.com/ | afford to commit any kind of folly, and | indulge in any kind of vice; it cannot | be killed, and the fragments that | survive can always laugh at the | dead.--Henry Adams
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 11:47:22 UTC