- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 08:04:53 -0500
- To: Jean-Guilhem Rouel <jean-gui@w3.org>
- Cc: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, webreq@w3.org, public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org, chairs@w3.org, Henry Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
On 25 May 2009, at 7:56 AM, Jean-Guilhem Rouel wrote: > Le 21/05/2009 20:17, Norman Walsh a écrit : >> [...] >> it does not start a new CR period or >> otherwise include any transitions. >> [...] >> The document passes pubrules despite the fact that the online checker >> seems unable to find the date necessary to pass test 5.1. > > Hi Norm, > > I think the checker can't find the date because it's in the past. > The sentence "Based on known implementations, the Working Group does > not plan to request to advance to Proposed Recommendation prior to > 01 February 2009." sounds a bit weird. I wonder if it shouldn't be > rephrased (but have no strong opinion). CC'ing Ian Jacobs in case he > has some input. Maybe the intention was to say 1 Feb 2010? _ Ian > > > Also, due to a webmaster shortage, publications are only made twice > a week (on Tuesdays and Thursdays), which means this document will > be published on Thursday 28. Feel free to adjust the date accordingly. > > Best Regards, > Jean-Gui > -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Monday, 25 May 2009 13:05:07 UTC