- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:37:37 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <546c6c1c0809250437u57a8bfds8c19bb87cfaa969a@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> writes: > > >> - Proposal to change p:insert, but I don't think that works for the > reasons > >> I cited above. > >> > > > > Well I don't agree > > What about Richard argument in http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2008/08/28- > > minutes > > [[ > > I like Richard's formulation: p:insert allows matching of anything > > which may have children if where is first or last, and anything that > _is_ > > a child if where is before or after > > ]] > > You're right. I got caught up just thinking about the document case. > > PROPOSAL: > > The match option can match element, text, processing-instruction, > and comment nodes. > > Change the description of err:XC0025 to read > > It is a dynamic error (err:XC0025) if the match pattern matches the > document element and the value of the position option is "before" or > "after" or if the match pattern matches anything other than an > element node and the value of the position option is "first-child" > or "last-child". > > I'm fine with that !! Thanks ! Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Thursday, 25 September 2008 11:38:13 UTC