- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 07:58:26 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2bpz4xgv1.fsf_-_@nwalsh.com>
Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes: > I was wondering whether we shouldn't say that options specified using > the shortcut form inherit the in-scope namespace bindings of the step > where they are specified - so that the following would work properly: > >> | >> | <!-- prefix p should be already bound at this point --> >> | <ex:delete-in-div xmlns:ex="http://example.org/ns/ex" >> | divchild="html:p[@class='delete']" >> | xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"/> > > In a reply, Mohammed pointed out that: > >> this bullet point in 5.7.5 >> [[ >> Otherwise, the in-scope namespaces from the element providing the >> value are used. >> ]] >> is not far from saying that > > Perhaps 5.7.5 should be more explicit about what happens with option > shortcuts? I think that is precisely what is meant, but I'll try to make it clearer. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | In every work of genius we recognize http://nwalsh.com/ | our own rejected thoughts; they come | back to us with a certain alienated | majesty.-- Emerson
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2008 11:59:14 UTC