- From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:50:41 -0500
- To: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
> "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> writes: > > >> > == Slight clarification == > >> > > >> > "it is a static error if the signature of a known step > in the version > >> > library has changed, except for new options." > >> > > >> > You should add "that are not using syntatic shortcut form" > >> > >> How do syntactic shortcut forms come into play? This > section is about > >> the declarations, not their use. > > > > Well ! not stricly speaking the following which says : > > > > "New options on known steps are ignored in the pipeline." > > > > Which could lead to the fact that new options (even in > shortcut form) are > > ignored in the pipeline > > > > Which seems odd with respect to err:XS0008 > > > > ""It is a static error if any element in the XProc > namespace has attributes > > not defined by this specification unless they are extension > attributes."" > > If you load the "2.0" XProc library and it adds a new "randomize" > option to p:namespace-rename, then the randomize option is allowed on > p:namespace-rename steps, either in p:option form or as a syntactic > shortcut. > > That declaration defines it. And our spec says that, so by extension > our spec defines it. > I agree. I don't think there is a problem with err:XS0008 here. Regards, Vojtech
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2008 07:51:29 UTC