- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:29:28 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2d4guors7.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> writes: >> > == Slight clarification == >> > >> > "it is a static error if the signature of a known step in the version >> > library has changed, except for new options." >> > >> > You should add "that are not using syntatic shortcut form" >> >> How do syntactic shortcut forms come into play? This section is about >> the declarations, not their use. > > Well ! not stricly speaking the following which says : > > "New options on known steps are ignored in the pipeline." > > Which could lead to the fact that new options (even in shortcut form) are > ignored in the pipeline > > Which seems odd with respect to err:XS0008 > > ""It is a static error if any element in the XProc namespace has attributes > not defined by this specification unless they are extension attributes."" If you load the "2.0" XProc library and it adds a new "randomize" option to p:namespace-rename, then the randomize option is allowed on p:namespace-rename steps, either in p:option form or as a syntactic shortcut. That declaration defines it. And our spec says that, so by extension our spec defines it. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The people who live in a Golden Age http://nwalsh.com/ | usually go around complaining how | yellow everything looks.--Randall | Jarrell
Received on Monday, 17 November 2008 23:30:13 UTC