- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:44:06 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2008 21:44:44 UTC
/ Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say:
| On 10 Jun 2008, at 21:11, Norman Walsh wrote:
|> I've got an action to say something about the functions that can be
|> used in XSLT match patterns. Here's a list of the additional functions
|> defined by XSLT (2.0):
|> [snip]
|> Do we say that these are required/forbidden/implementation-defined in
|> match patterns?
|>
|> I'm tempted to say they're forbidden, just for simplicity.
|
| That or implementation-defined works for me.
I was tempted to say implementation-defined (generate-id() isn't in
XPath, it's in XSLT!? Boy, did that bite me hard the other day in
XQuery :-) but that introduces interoperability problems. That's why I
came down on the side of forbidden.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | No matter how cynical I get, I find I
http://nwalsh.com/ | just can't keep up.--Lily Tomlin
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2008 21:44:44 UTC