- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:44:06 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2008 21:44:44 UTC
/ Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say: | On 10 Jun 2008, at 21:11, Norman Walsh wrote: |> I've got an action to say something about the functions that can be |> used in XSLT match patterns. Here's a list of the additional functions |> defined by XSLT (2.0): |> [snip] |> Do we say that these are required/forbidden/implementation-defined in |> match patterns? |> |> I'm tempted to say they're forbidden, just for simplicity. | | That or implementation-defined works for me. I was tempted to say implementation-defined (generate-id() isn't in XPath, it's in XSLT!? Boy, did that bite me hard the other day in XQuery :-) but that introduces interoperability problems. That's why I came down on the side of forbidden. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | No matter how cynical I get, I find I http://nwalsh.com/ | just can't keep up.--Lily Tomlin
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2008 21:44:44 UTC