- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:49:07 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2008 19:50:26 UTC
/ Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> was heard to say: | I was reluctant to introduce $p:index in p:label-elements partly | because it seems inconsistent with other steps that use position() for | position in a sequence. | | I don't think we can hope to make position() work in p:label-elements, | so I wonder if we should use $p:index in p:split-sequence and other | steps where we need to keep track of the position. Further analysis: * "and other steps" is the empty set, AFAICT * this change would require creating a $p:last-index or some such So maybe it's not with considering. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | We are afraid of the old age which we http://nwalsh.com/ | may never attain.--La Bruyère
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2008 19:50:26 UTC