- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:38:29 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 19 July 2008 19:39:05 UTC
There is still reference to 'ignore-inline-prefixes' in the sample definition and to 'exclude-result-prefixes' in the spec Mohamed On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > | This has never been fixed ? > > It has been now. I chose 'exclude-inline-prefixes' for consistency with > XSLT. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Labor, n. One of the processes by which > http://nwalsh.com/ | A acquires property for B.--Ambrose > | Bierce > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Saturday, 19 July 2008 19:39:05 UTC