- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:26:08 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2008 20:26:15 UTC
/ Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> was heard to say: | / Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say: | | ...but supporting text or html might be really nice. For example, a simple | | pipeline could transform a document into *HTML* using html serialization | | and then use the http-request step to send it to a web service (e.g. a | | PUT request to store it). | | I'm confused. We *have* serialization parameters which would support | that (if the implementation supports it), what do you think we need to | change? Nevermind. I see now. Bah. Feeping creaturism. Not in V1. That's my gut reaction. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything should be made as simple as http://nwalsh.com/ | possible, but no simpler.
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2008 20:26:15 UTC