- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:13:15 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2myqtn80k.fsf@nwalsh.com>
I think I convinced Alex not for V1 :-)
/ Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say:
| I'm motivated to try to satisfy part of comment #26 in that we could
| easily support non-XML output methods (e.g. 'text' and 'html') by saying
| that these are wrapped in a c:result element.
|
| This would require some knowledge of the output method. Certain APIs
| for XSLT do not provide that information easily as the result of the
| transformation
| is streamed to the receiving object. As a result, this could be difficult to
| implement this.
|
| ...but supporting text or html might be really nice. For example, a simple
| pipeline could transform a document into *HTML* using html serialization
| and then use the http-request step to send it to a web service (e.g. a
| PUT request to store it).
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Of all lies, art is the least untrue.--
http://nwalsh.com/ | Flaubert
Received on Friday, 25 January 2008 17:13:24 UTC