- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:20:59 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2008 16:21:16 UTC
Nope, that one didn't make it through. (See minutes of 14 Feb 2008). / Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say: | I'm really sorry to bring this up, and if people shout at me I'll go | away, but it just struck me that now that p:declare-step has such | prominence now we really ought to give it a better name. | | In XSLT, we don't have <xsl:declare-template> or | <xsl:declare-decimal-format>, we have <xsl:template> and | <xsl:decimal-format>. In XSD, we don't have <xs:defineComplexType> or | <xs:declareElement>, we have <xs:complexType> and <xs:element>. | | So let's rename <p:declare-step> as p:step or p:step-type or | p:step-kind -- the important thing is what we're declaring, not the | fact that we're declaring it. | | Cheers, | | Jeni | -- | Jeni Tennison | http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2008 16:21:16 UTC