- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:29:32 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2wsmmdvfn.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say:
| This looks fine to me. The only thing I'd add, for usability, is the
| ability to specify this higher up the tree as well as locally on
| exclude-result-prefixes. I imagine that most pipelines will have
| namespaces that shouldn't be included on *any* inline documents, and
| it would be tedious to have to specify the same attribute on every
| <p:inline>.
|
| I'd suggest adding it to <p:pipeline-library>, <p:pipeline> and
| <p:declare-step>, but you could just allow it on any element that
| could have a descendant <p:inline>.
I'm happy with that if we're willing to change the spelling to
exclude-inline-prefixes
Actually, I think I'd like to make that change in any case. We
*aren't* excluding namespaces on results, we're excluding them on
inlines.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The man with ten children is better off
http://nwalsh.com/ | than the one with ten thousand fonts of
| type, because the man with ten children
| doesn't want any more.
Received on Friday, 25 April 2008 11:30:10 UTC