- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:29:32 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2wsmmdvfn.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say: | This looks fine to me. The only thing I'd add, for usability, is the | ability to specify this higher up the tree as well as locally on | exclude-result-prefixes. I imagine that most pipelines will have | namespaces that shouldn't be included on *any* inline documents, and | it would be tedious to have to specify the same attribute on every | <p:inline>. | | I'd suggest adding it to <p:pipeline-library>, <p:pipeline> and | <p:declare-step>, but you could just allow it on any element that | could have a descendant <p:inline>. I'm happy with that if we're willing to change the spelling to exclude-inline-prefixes Actually, I think I'd like to make that change in any case. We *aren't* excluding namespaces on results, we're excluding them on inlines. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The man with ten children is better off http://nwalsh.com/ | than the one with ten thousand fonts of | type, because the man with ten children | doesn't want any more.
Received on Friday, 25 April 2008 11:30:10 UTC