- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:25:25 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <546c6c1c0804240725q3273c87an62e2d84eb810baf2@mail.gmail.com>
Sorry, that was not exactly my point I was thinking of something like "http://www.example.com/application" which could be concatenated to "?foo=1&bar=2" because parameters has two parameter foo and bar defined Am I right, or do I misunderstand that May there should be an example of what is the expected result Regards, Mohamed On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > | In 7.2.8 p:www-form-urlencode > | Please add the possibility that the string value of the matched node > could > | be kept and concatenated to the generated string may be as an option > | If not you should provide at least at static prefix as p:option > > Uhm. What value is a random bit of string before or after a set of > url-encoded parameters. It's either going to mangle the name of the > first key or the value of the last. > > I suppose we could add an encode-content option: > > <p:option name="encode-content"/> <!-- xs:string --> > > And say that it provides the name of the key to use for the content. > So if you say <p:www-form-urlencode encode-content="foo">... then > the string value of the matched node is used, "&foo=stringvalue", in > the encoded result. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | I don't make predictions. I never have > http://nwalsh.com/ | and I never will.--Tony Blair > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Thursday, 24 April 2008 14:26:04 UTC