- From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:27:56 +0100 (BST)
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
> No, I don't think that was intended. How about > > The scope of the names of step types is the pipeline in which they occur. > The in-scope names come from types that are: > > * Built-in to XProc (e.g., p:pipeline, p:choose, etc.) > * Declared with p:declare-step (e.g, p:xslt, p:xinclude, etc.) > in the pipeline or in a p:pipeline-library imported into the > pipeline. > * Defined with p:pipeline imported directly or in a p:pipeline-library > imported into the pipeline. > * Or built-in as extensions by a particular processor. So a pipeline library can contain two pipelines that both declare steps called "foo"? -- Richard
Received on Friday, 28 September 2007 12:28:51 UTC