- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:46:30 +0200
- To: "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 9/27/07, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> wrote: > > On 9/27/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > to avoid further research can we, even if it will need a few keystroke > > more, clarify the name of such an option > > > > why not > > change-different-only or something like > > That reverses the boolean. > > Or how about "add-to-all" and keep the existing sematics. I think to clarify the behaviour, we need to reverse the boolean, because what is problematique is "what it is it, if not all" ? > > > -- > --Alex Milowski > "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the > inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language > considered." > > Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2007 18:46:41 UTC