- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:25:56 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 9/11/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > Furthermore, if I understand correctly[3], it would be an acceptable > compromise to add the detailed descriptions of what actions are > required on a step-by-step basis to achieve namespace well-formed > results as a non-normative appendix. I think that this is not only a "compromise", but an approach that makes a lot of sense: let's have a general description of how step ought to behave with regard to namespace fixup (that is section 2.6.1), but if we can provide guidance that we consider useful on how to implement those rules for specific steps, then we should do this as well, and a non-normative appendix seems like the right place to do so. Alex -- Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms, open-source, for the Enterprise http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2007 17:26:05 UTC