- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:11:22 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Norman Walsh writes:
> / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> | It enlighten that serializing the document at each step need to keep
> | some Doctype information, isn'it ?
>
> I think an implementation that chooses to serialize at each step is
> going to find it challenging to preserve attribute type which is why,
> I assume, Henry put it in the "should" pile and not the "must" pile.
Precisely.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG4ZRKkjnJixAXWBoRAjnhAJ4lOySjXdu0q05sZX6U6FVDlUuvVwCfbVit
qfpfnG16gYV/PzaI8xfBd5c=
=Zksz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 7 September 2007 18:11:54 UTC