- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 07:28:49 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2abs0vxqm.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk> was heard to say: | Um. Having one implementation where you can rely on that doesn't seem | very useful: people will write pipelines that work in your | implementation and then find they don't work in others. It's like | relying on argument evaluation order, or how a++ + a++ comes out in a | given C compiler. If there's a need for non-duplication between | documents it should either be required or there should be a switch to | guarantee it. So what do folks think? Sequential numbers, some guarantee of global uniqueness, or implementation defined? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Who knows whether the best of men be http://nwalsh.com/ | known? or whether there be not more | remarkable persons forgot, than any | that stand remembered in the known | account of time.--Sir Thomas Browne
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2007 11:28:59 UTC