- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 15:51:24 +0200
- To: jeni@jenitennison.com
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Jeni, Reading more of your concerns (Mike and You) I propose to add a p:system-property support-psvi which could be (true/false or yes/no) that would give the answer By the way this implementation dependent thing is reported twice in A.1 [[ 23. Whether or not the pipeline processor supports passing PSVI annotations between steps is implementation-defined. See Section 7.2.3, "p:validate-with-xml-schema". ]] and [[ 28. It is implementation-defined whether additional information items and properties, particularly those made available in the PSVI, are preserved between steps. See Section A.3, "Infoset Conformance". ]] Any thoughts ? Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 13:51:35 UTC