- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 00:25:31 +0100
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Hum...not sure it falls in the same category Can you give an example where referencing them could lead to confusion ? Mohamed On Nov 7, 2007 4:56 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk> was heard to say: > | The defaulted output port of a subpipeline is given the name "result". > | And the defaulted input and output ports of a pipeline (if we keep them) > | are given the names "source" and "result". > | > | Since the purpose of these is to simplify the very basic case of > | straight-line pipelines, wouldn't it be better for them to have > | unusable names such as "!result"? > > Yes, I think so. Just as we gave anonymous steps unreferenceable names. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A man must have grown old and lived > http://nwalsh.com/ | long in order to see how short life > | is.-- Schopenhauer > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2007 23:25:42 UTC