- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 20:16:20 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 5/30/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > | On 5/30/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > |> Do any of these changes need additional discussion? > |> > |> 1. Add p:empty as a peer to p:inline/p:document/p:pipe to explicitly > |> set the context to an empty document sequence > | > | Does it mean > | Replace places where we have (p:inline|p:document|p:pipe)* > | by p:empty|(p:inline|p:document|p:pipe)+ > > No, it'll be (p:inline|p:document|p:pipe|p:empty)* hum... > > If you don't provide any binding at all, you get a binding to the > default readable port. Ok fair enough But the model as explained is troublesome (some would end up trying to understand, p:empty as "empty document" which has no meaning) so I guess (p:empty|(p:inline|p:document|p:pipe)+)? Mohamed > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2007 18:24:05 UTC