- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 09:45:38 +0200
- To: "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
I like the way option are going We know their names They have simple types We can access to them trough $variable binding So when I look again to p:count, p:store and p:xsl-formatter, I see a different semantic for port !result Everywhere, the port !result is related to the input (say it has a content which is the input more or less deltas) except p:count, p:store and p:xsl-formatter I'm proposing two things : 1) state the fact that we use !result in a consistent manner through the XProc spec 2) change the signature of p:count and p:store 2.a) change the port named !result by another name and keep result if necessary 2.b) OR introduce a new semantic, p:export-option, that simply makes available to the subsequent step the value of an option <p:count/> <!-- here $count has been exported as the value of count and !result reexport the input --> I would also argue that p:tee would be no more needed if !result of p:store would make available the input Regards, Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Saturday, 26 May 2007 07:45:44 UTC