- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 15:21:00 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Norman Walsh writes: > Whether we spell "position()" with or without a "p:" prefix, do we > agree that the following pipeline > > <p:pipeline xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/2007/03/xproc" > name="pipeline"> > > <p:output port="result"/> > > <p:for-each> > <p:iteration-source> > <p:inline><doc v="test" s="test">one</doc></p:inline> > <p:inline><doc v="test" s="test">two</doc></p:inline> > <p:inline><doc v="test" s="test">three</doc></p:inline> > <p:inline><doc v="test" s="test">four</doc></p:inline> > </p:iteration-source> > <p:output port="result"/> > > <p:string-replace> > <p:option name="match" value="doc/@v"/> > <p:option name="replace" value="p:position()"/> <!-- NB: value= --> > </p:string-replace> > > <p:string-replace> > <p:option name="match" value="doc/@s"/> > <p:option name="replace" select="p:position()"/> <!-- NB: select= --> > </p:string-replace> > </p:for-each> > > </p:pipeline> > > produces > > <doc v="1" s="1">one</doc> > <doc v="1" s="2">two</doc> > <doc v="1" s="3">three</doc> > <doc v="1" s="4">four</doc> > > That is, the position function evaluated in the context of the > for-each counts the iterations through the sequence, but the position > function evaluated in the context of the inputs passed to the > string-replace function only ever sees one document because it doesn't > receive a sequence. I don't see why these should be different. My original proposal was that in the context of an iteration, p:position would always tell you what the position of the document being processed in the subpipeline is -- why should that be different in at the margin of the component, or inside it? ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGVZ9MkjnJixAXWBoRAlynAJ9ahhh7t3qHTgNlDMmybApTnNUkLgCeIgqy 7YQAZv5rvKYWU6tPkMKfwEk= =164n -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 14:22:13 UTC