- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 09:57:56 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 13:58:03 UTC
/ Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk> was heard to say: | Just a minor point, but I think that have numbers to identify errors | is a really bad idea, which should have gone out in the 1960s. If | we need standardised error identifiers, they should be reasonably | meaningful strings like XS-step-loop instead of XS0001. /me shrugs I was just following in the footsteps of our circa 1960 bretheren, XPath 2.0 and XSLT 2.0. If you'd like to propose alternate local names for errors, I don't object to making them names instead of numbers. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Human felicity is produced not so much http://nwalsh.com/ | by great pieces of good fortune that | seldom happen, as by little advantages | that occur every day.--Benjamin Franklin
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 13:58:03 UTC