- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 08:42:45 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87k5uyie9m.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com> was heard to say: | On 5/23/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: |> when I can't say |> |> <p:option name="match" value="//foo[@bar = $bar-value]"/> | | This wouldn't bother me at all. With value, you pass a string to the | component. It happens that this string is evaluated as an XPath | expression by the component. Why would the component know about | something called $bar-value? /me shrugs Aside from the really nasty quoting issue, I suppose you can always construct a string value that includes the literal $bar-value so it's not a complete show-stopper if we remove the variable bindings. And with a little &apos; hackery, I expect it would be possible to work around the quoting issue if it ever came up. I still think it's asking a lot for users to remember when they can and cannot use $bar-value references in different options on the same step. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | If today was a fish, I'd throw it back http://nwalsh.com/ | in.
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 12:43:19 UTC