- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 08:42:45 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87k5uyie9m.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com> was heard to say:
| On 5/23/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
|> when I can't say
|>
|> <p:option name="match" value="//foo[@bar = $bar-value]"/>
|
| This wouldn't bother me at all. With value, you pass a string to the
| component. It happens that this string is evaluated as an XPath
| expression by the component. Why would the component know about
| something called $bar-value?
/me shrugs
Aside from the really nasty quoting issue, I suppose you can always
construct a string value that includes the literal $bar-value so it's
not a complete show-stopper if we remove the variable bindings.
And with a little &apos; hackery, I expect it would be possible to
work around the quoting issue if it ever came up.
I still think it's asking a lot for users to remember when they can
and cannot use $bar-value references in different options on the
same step.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | If today was a fish, I'd throw it back
http://nwalsh.com/ | in.
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 12:43:19 UTC