Re: Types for Option Values

On 5/23/07, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote:
>
> If we do allow options to be typed in v1, then given we are using XPath
> 1.0 we should stick with the simple types available in XPath 1.0: the
> type attribute could be xs:string, xs:double or xs:boolean. We would
> have to have some wording that stated the values were interpreted
> according to the XSD rules rather than as XPath literals, but that
> shouldn't be too hard. This would give us a clear upgrade path for a
> future version where we might use XPath 2.0.

+1  and we should immediately take (XPath 1.0) intersect (XML Schema
1.0) to avoid problems

Mohamed

-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €

Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 12:28:45 UTC