- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:43:02 +0200
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 5/23/07, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote: > If we do allow options to be typed in v1, then given we are using XPath > 1.0 we should stick with the simple types available in XPath 1.0: the > type attribute could be xs:string, xs:double or xs:boolean. We would > have to have some wording that stated the values were interpreted > according to the XSD rules rather than as XPath literals, but that > shouldn't be too hard. This would give us a clear upgrade path for a > future version where we might use XPath 2.0. Simple enough, good enough. That works for me. Alex -- Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms for the Enterprise http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 11:43:09 UTC