- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 12:29:42 +0200
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 5/23/07, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote: > <p:option name="element-name" type="xs:QName" value="my:foo" /> We can either: 1) Pass the namespaces in scope to the step, along with other information we have talked about. 2) Exclude QName from the list of simple types that can be used. But I wouldn't throw away the whole typing functionality just because there is an issue with QName. > I suppose we *could* say that the type attribute purely constrained the > lexical representation of the value, and the value itself is a string, > but I do think this would cause confusion. This conflicts with the definition of what a QName is, so I would prefer to adopt #1 or #2 mentioned earlier. Alex -- Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms for the Enterprise http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2007 10:29:46 UTC