- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:23:04 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 21:23:16 UTC
/ Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say: | Shouldn't $p:position and $loop_index be the same? We say: In which loop? | "In contexts where a sequence of documents is being processed, for example, | in the test expression of a p:matching-documents, this variable returns the | position of the current document within the sequence. Numbering begins at | one." | | The for-each processes a sequence. Yeah, maybe I got p:document-position() wrong. I wonder if we can do without the p:document-index() forms? Maybe users could set an option? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The effects of weakness are http://nwalsh.com/ | inconceivable, and more prodigious than | those of the most violent | passions.--Cardinal De Retz
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 21:23:16 UTC