- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:23:04 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 21:23:16 UTC
/ Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say:
| Shouldn't $p:position and $loop_index be the same? We say:
In which loop?
| "In contexts where a sequence of documents is being processed, for example,
| in the test expression of a p:matching-documents, this variable returns the
| position of the current document within the sequence. Numbering begins at
| one."
|
| The for-each processes a sequence.
Yeah, maybe I got p:document-position() wrong. I wonder if we can do
without the p:document-index() forms? Maybe users could set an option?
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The effects of weakness are
http://nwalsh.com/ | inconceivable, and more prodigious than
| those of the most violent
| passions.--Cardinal De Retz
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 21:23:16 UTC