- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 22:27:01 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 5/14/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > | > | If $p:position is always 1, why have $p:position? > > Position is always 1 in for-each and viewport because they're odd cases. > Consider this example instead: Ok p:viewport can accept only one document as input But that's not the case for for-each ! So what is your point so that $p:position to stick to 1 in the for-each ? As you can see it in this thread, I proposed that $p:position is equal to the position of the document extract in the source sequence Therefore it still sticks to the definition used in p:matching-documents, our root use case Am I implying something wrong ? Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Monday, 14 May 2007 20:27:06 UTC