- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 16:14:39 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <877irf6rtc.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com> was heard to say: | On 5/11/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: |> | Good point. If instead it was ffa7ffa7, then this would return an |> | empty node set, and you wouldn't get an error. |> |> Right. For maximum confusion :-) | | Let's assume we use AVTs instead of a second 'select' attribute. Well, in this particular case, what I wanted was "value='$p:episode'", not select or an AVT. It's the fact that the expression in the option needs *not* to be evaluated when the option is specified that causes (or caused me, anyway) the confusion. As to AVTs, let's assume we don't :-) We don't have them yet and I haven't (personally) been persuaded that we should add them. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The shortness of life can neither http://nwalsh.com/ | dissuade us from its pleasures, nor | console us for its pains.-- Vauvenargues
Received on Friday, 11 May 2007 20:14:45 UTC