- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 21:49:18 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
I would rather go for a special component : p:wrap-sequence, since I need grouping on p:wrap and not on p:wrap-sequence On 5/11/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > I have a sequence of documents that I'd like to turn into a single > document by putting an element wrapper around the whole sequence. > p:wrap seems like the obvious answer, but it doesn't accept a > sequence. > > I propose that we change the signature of p:wrap to make this > possible: > > <p:declare-step type="p:wrap"> > <p:input port="source" sequence="yes"/> > <p:output port="result"/> > <p:option name="name" required="yes"/> > <p:option name="match"/> > </p:declare-step> > > If a match expression is specified, then it is an error for a sequence > to appear on the source port. > > If the match expression is not specified, then the wrapper is placed > around the whole sequence of documents on the source port. (The whole > sequence may, naturally, be a single document.) > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | On the other hand, you have different > http://nwalsh.com/ | fingers. > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Friday, 11 May 2007 19:49:30 UTC